Limitation Act, 1963–Sec. 5–Trial Court allowed the restoration application by condoning the delay of nine years and eleven months–Revision against–Dismissed by High Court with enhancing the cost from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 1,50,000/- –Approach of Trial Court was unsustainable in law–Claim of respondent no. 1 is based on an unregistered agreement of sale–Respondent no. 1 was not impleaded in the original suit and he was a stranger–Application for restoration on behest of him was not sustainable–Further, the application for taking the LRs. of original plaintiff was pending and it could have been decided on merits–Reasons given by the Trial Court and High Court for condoning the delay do not come under the ambit of sufficient cause–Impugned orders are liable to be quashed and set aside.
