Criminal Trial–Prosecution Story–Reliability–Claim of the first informant that his family was having only one mobile phone and the appellant took away this while fleeing after the incident–Fact is found falsified as PW 6 admitted that he received a call from S that the appellant has killed the deceased–Neither the ownership detail nor the call details were collected by I.O.–Further, it is impossible to believe that in a large family from rural background, a ten years old child would be owing to a mobile phone whereas none of other family members has such facility.
