Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 302, 447 & 147–Conviction–Circumstantial evidence–Appreciation of–Circumstances that the appellants were owning money towards the deceased is not a circumstance which can exclude every other hypothesis than that of guilt of the accused because the other persons were also demanding the money towards the deceased–Recovered articles also not helping the prosecution–Link evidence in regard to foot-prints was not produced by the prosecution–Held, the guilt of appellants could not be established beyond the reasonable doubt–Conviction cannot be sustained.