Rajasthan Money Lenders Act, 1963–Secs. 22 & 23–Suit for recovery of money–Decreed by Trial Court–Appeal against–Allowed by first appellate Court–Appreciation of–It was not narrated in the plaint that the money was given in relation to business transaction–Appellant-plaintiff failed to produce the licence of money lending–Defendant successfully proved that the plaintiff is a money lender, however, plaintiff failed to prove the compliance of provisions of Sec. 23–Held, first appellate Court rightly dismissed the suit.
Tola Ram (M/s.) vs. LR’s. of Late Sh. Nirmal Kumar Surana alias Nirmal Kumar Singh Surana & Anr.
₹36.00