Evidence Act, 1872–Sec. 65–Code of Civil Procedure, 1908–Order 7, Rule 14–Applications under–Allowed–Suit for recovery of possession, declaration, mesne profit and permanent injunction–Case of plaintiffs that the property was old and it was sold by them to one M and, therefore, the original documents were in possession of M and there were no details available to them with respect of his residence and it was not possible for them to obtain the original documents–Even, M was also not the party in the claim–Document, fall under the category of public documents as mentioned in Sec. 74(2) of the Evidence Act–Since the original document can neither be easily searched nor summoned by the Trial Court, the photocopy attested by notary public can be exhibited and proved as the secondary evidence–Further, the mandate laid down in Sec. 66 shall not be required to be fulfilled because M is neither the party before the Trial Court nor he can be said to be in the reach of the Trial Court–Held, impugned order does not require for any interference.
