Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973–Sec. 145–Attachment of property and appointment of receiver–Justification–Petitioner was in possession of godown–Dispute arose when the respondent no. 2 tried to get the electricity connection–FIR was lodged and the parties had been bound down u/ss. 107 & 116 Cr.P.C.–There was no reason for the SHO to apprehend that some altercation would take place resulting in public disorder–SHO has not even stated what the incident was, which impelled him to bound down the parties–FIR does not seem to be of that serious nature, for which the property could be attached and a receiver could be appointed–Application in question was filed at least 45 days after the incident of minor tussle (that too without any weapon)–Trial Court has proceeded in a mechanical manner–Order of appointment of the receiver is quashed and Trial Court is directed to conclude the proceedings on or before 30.06.2024.
