Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988–Sec. 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2)–Penal Code, 1860–Secs. 420 & 120-B–Discharge–Allegation that the goods were supplied with delay –Whether can be termed as an offence ?–Held, no–No case of the prosecution that the low quality samples were sent–Further, the articles which were found damaged were changed by the concerned firm–Hence it cannot be held that the goods supplied were of low quality–Held, discharge was justified.