Specific Relief Act, 1963–Secs. 34 & 38–Attachment of property because of due recovery–Suit for permanent injunction–Decreed by first appellate Court–Property was belonging to M–He executed the will in favour of plaintiff–No evidence to show that the property was owned by L, the proprietor of firm against the demand of sales tax was outstanding–Plea of the share of L taken by appellant-department is baseless–Held, suit was rightly decreed by first appellate Court.
