Penal Code, 1860–Sec. 302–Conviction–Proper Section–Version of eye-witnesses completely supports the version of defence about the accidental firing–Father of deceased who deposed that the appellant opened the fire intentionally, was not the eye-witness–Further, this allegation was made after three to four months of the incident–Report of ballistic expert shows that the firing was made from a close distance–Semi-automatic Fire(SAF) Carbine got entangled with the chain attached to the belt of the appellant–PW 12 did not report for two months about what he heard–His version is not inspired with confidence–Intention is nowhere established–Conviction altered u/s. 304-A.
