Permanent Injunction–Suit for–Dismissal of–Plaintiffs claimed the way of 10 ft. width to have access on the agricultural lands and houses–They failed to prove the existence of way at the site–Mere reference of way in the sale deed of plaintiffs is not sufficient–No way is indicated in the revenue record–Plaintiffs have not instituted any civil suit praying for declaration of easementary rights–They have the alternative way of 18 ft. width–Held, no perversity is found in the findings.
